ELITE TRADERS PRIVATE MENTORSHIP APPLICATION

• Review of experience, availability, constraints, and stated objectives
• Internal assessment for alignment with program standards
• Advancement only when expectations are clearly understood and accepted

• Direct discussion of current level, schedule, and expectations
• Clear explanation of how the program operates in practice
• Confirmation of alignment on both sides before proceeding

• Review of decision-making process and execution habits
• Identification of structural weaknesses and recurring errors
• Definition of what remains and what must change

The curriculum is applied through execution, documentation, and review, not consumed passively.

• Market structure and contextual analysis
• VWAP execution standards
• Swing and macro frameworks
• Risk management, sizing, journaling, and review
• Psychology and decision-making under pressure

• Review of real trades and documented decisions
• Decision quality is assessed, not worship of PnL
• Corrections and targets are set for the next cycle
• Missed submissions, incomplete documentation, or vague explanations are addressed directly and immediately

• Patterns are identified and tracked across time
• Discipline lapses are addressed before they compound
• Progress and recurring issues are documented clearly

• Progress is tied to execution consistency
• Responsibility increases only after standards hold
• Size is treated as a professional responsibility

• Clear criteria for scaling and for holding size
• Execution must remain stable as responsibility increases
• Capital deployment rules are defined and enforced

• One year access
• Live execution exposure
• Context on process and decision making
• Access does not mean participation in decision making
• Exposure is for learning standards, not copying trades

• Evaluation is based on consistency, communication, and professionalism
• Opportunities emerge over time, not on completion
• No promises, position is earned through standards